• search
  • Live TV
ತ್ವರಿತ ಅಲರ್ಟ್ ಗಳಿಗಾಗಿ
ನೋಟಿಫಿಕೇಷನ್ ಅನುಮತಿಸಿ  
ತ್ವರಿತ ಅಲರ್ಟ್ ಗಳಿಗಾಗಿ
ನೋಟಿಫಿಕೇಷನ್ ಅನುಮತಿಸಿ  
For Daily Alerts

3 ಜಡ್ಜ್ ಗಳಿಗೆ ಎದುರಾದ 6 ಪ್ರಮುಖ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆಗಳು

By Mahesh
|
ಲಖ್ನೋ, ಸೆ.30: ಅಯೋಧ್ಯೆಯ ವಿವಾದಿತ ಬಾಬ್ರಿ ಮಸೀದಿ ರಾಮ್ ಲಲ್ಲಾ ವಿವಾದ ಪ್ರಕರಣದಲ್ಲಿ ಮೂವರು ನ್ಯಾಯಾಧೀಶರಾದ ಸಿಬ್ಘಾತ್ ಉಲ್ಲಾ ಖಾನ್, ಸುಧೀರ್ ಅಗರ್ ವಾಲ್ ಹಾಗೂ ಧರಮ್ ವೀರ್ ಶರ್ಮಾ ಅವರು ಗಳು ನ್ಯಾಯ ನಿರ್ಣಯ ನೀಡುವ ಮುನ್ನ ಅವರಿಗೆ ಎದುರಾದ ಪ್ರಮುಖ ಆರು ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆಗಳು ಇಂತಿವೆ. (ತೀರ್ಪಿನ ವಿವರಗಳಿಗಾಗಿ ಕ್ಲಿಕ್ಕಿಸಿ)

ಜಿಜ್ಞಾಸೆ 1. Whether the disputed site is the birth place of BhagwanRam?

ಪರಿಹಾರ:The disputed site is the birth place of Lord Ram. Place of birth is a juristic person and is a deity. It is personified as the spirit of divine worshipped as birth place of Lord Rama as a child.

Spirit of divine ever remains present every where at all times for any one to invoke at any shape or form in accordance with his own aspirations and it can be shapeless and formless also.

ಜಿಜ್ಞಾಸೆ 2. Whether the disputed building was a mosque? When was it built? By whom?

ಪರಿಹಾರ:The disputed building was constructed by Babar, the year is not certain but it was built against the tenets of Islam. Thus, it cannot have the character of a mosque.

ಜಿಜ್ಞಾಸೆ 3. Whether the mosque was built after demolishing a Hindu temple?

ಪರಿಹಾರ:The disputed structure was constructed on the site of old structure after demolition of the same. The Archaeological Survey of India has proved that the structure was a massive Hindu religious structure.

ಜಿಜ್ಞಾಸೆ 4. Whether the idols were placed in the building on the night of December 22/23rd, 1949?

ಪರಿಹಾರ:The idols were placed in the middle dome of the disputed structure in the intervening night of 22/23.12.1949.

ಜಿಜ್ಞಾಸೆ 5. Whether any of the claims for title is time barred?

ಪರಿಹಾರ:O.O.S. No. 4 of 1989, the Sunni Central Board of Waqfs U.P., Lucknow and others Vs. Gopal Singh Visharad and others and O.O.S. No.3 of 1989, Nirmohi Akhara and Another Vs. Sri Jamuna Prasad Singh and others are barred by time.

ಜಿಜ್ಞಾಸೆ 6. What will be the status of the disputed site e.g. inner and outer courtyard?

ಪರಿಹಾರ:It is established that the property in suit is the site of Janm Bhumi of Ram Chandra Ji and Hindus in general had the right to worship Charan, Sita Rasoi, other idols and other object of worship existed upon the property in suit. It is also established that Hindus have been worshipping the place in

dispute as Janm Sthan i.e. a birth place as deity and visiting it as a sacred place of pilgrimage as of right since time immemorial.

After the construction of the disputed structure it is proved the deities were installed inside the disputed structure on 22/23.12.1949. It is also proved that the outer courtyard was in exclusive possession of Hindus and they were worshipping throughout and in the inner courtyard (in the disputed structure) they were also worshipping. It is also established that the disputed structure cannot be treated as a mosque as it came into existence against the tenets of Islam.

ಸೆಲ್ ಫೋನಿನಲ್ಲಿ ಕನ್ನಡ ಓದುವ ಸಂಭ್ರಮ | ದಟ್ಸ್ ಕನ್ನಡ ಹೂವಿನಂಗಡಿ 24/7 | ಕನ್ನಡ ಸಿನಿಮಾ SMS | ಕನ್ನಡ ಸುದ್ದಿಗಳ SMS

ಕನ್ನಡ ಮ್ಯಾಟ್ರಿಮೋನಿಯಲ್ಲಿ - ಉಚಿತ ನೋಂದಣಿ !

ತಾಜಾ ಸುದ್ದಿ ತಕ್ಷಣ ಪಡೆಯಿರಿ
Enable
x
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Oneindia sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Oneindia website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more