ಮುಖಪುಟ
Dear Editor:
This is in response to the well-meaning advice of Dr. Nataraj for energizing the AKKA function. I would like to address the ten points proposed by him. I was the President of Vidyaranya Kannada Kuta in Chicago and a member of the by-law committee of AKKA to draft the Amended Constitution and hence am fairly familiar with the Organization.
I
agree
that
there
is
no
need
for
anyone
in
Karnataka
to
worry
about
the
status
of
AKKA
here.
We
are
all
fully
capable
of
resolving
any
differences
and
move
forward.
As
far
as
arranging
press
conferences
in
Karnataka,
I
don’t
see
anything
wrong.
We
want
our
people
back
home
to
know
what
we
as
Kannadigas
are
doing
for
Kannada
and
Karnataka
here.
This
is
all
the
more
important
for
the
proposed
AKKA
Charitable
Foundation,
which
needs
the
input
from
various
non-profit
organizations
and
dedicated
volunteers
there.
He
has
said
all
Presidents
of
Kannada
Kutas
should
be
involved.
We
amended
the
Constitution
of
AKKA
to
include
all
Presidents
of
Kannada
Kutas
as
Directors
and
they
have
a
majority
in
the
Board.
In
effect,
they
have
a
big
say
in
the
Organization.
The
amendments
were
approved
with
a
majority.
Please
visit
AKKAonlne.org
to
read
the
amended
Constitution.
As
in
any
Democratic
organization,
we
can
amend
this
any
time,
if
need
be.
I
agree
there
is
no
need
for
anyone
in
Karnataka
to
influence
our
activities
here
and
I
can
assure
you
that
is
the
goal
of
the
Organization.
AKKA
does
not
expect
any
financial
aid
nor
seek
the
same
from
Karnataka
Government.
However,
when
we
invite
them,
it
is
upto
them
to
send
the
Artists,
Politicians,
etc.
We
have
no
control
over
that
process
and
we
should
not
expect
that
either.
We
cannot
just
invite
the
CM.
What
if
he
is
unable
to
come?
Also,
there
is
a
Minister
for
Culture
and
it
is
only
appropriate
we
invite
that
person
also.
AKKA
spends
quite
a
bit
of
money
on
the
invited
Artists.
We
don’t
spend
money
on
the
Govt.
sponsored
Artists.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
the
registration
fees
do
not
cover
all
the
expenses
of
the
convention.
Invariably,
we
need
$50-$80
per
person
additional
amount
to
meet
the
expenses
and
that
is
when
the
generous
donors
pitch
in.
This
has
been
the
experience
of
all
the
National
level
Organizations
that
I
know
of.
As
far
as
local
talent
is
concerned,
some
of
them
are
good
but
as
our
experiences
in
the
individual
Kannada
Kutas
have
shown,
we
do
need
professionals
to
attract
a
large
number
of
audience.
Conducting
the
Conventions
in
an
orderly
and
timely
fashion
goes
without
saying.
The
Houston
Sammelana
was
outstanding
in
this
area.
We
need
to
learn
from
them
and
conduct
our
future
Conventions
to
emulate
Houston
experience.
I
am
sure
the
Organizers
of
the
Orlando
Convention
are
very
cognizant
of
this.
I
have
no
idea
how
donating
to
AKKA
benefits
the
donors
personally.
It
is
only
fair
that
we
honor
them
for
their
generous
donations.
I
don’t
know
of
anyone
who
has
donated
large
sums
and
benefited
from
AKKA.
I
do
agree
that
donors
should
not
be
encouraged
to
use
AKKA
for
personal
gains
and
that
is
why
the
Board
of
Directors
is
there
to
see
that
things
are
under
control.
The
last
point
was
debated
quite
a
bit
while
proposing
the
amendments.
That
is
why,
the
Board
has
the
majority
control
with
the
Kannada
Kuta
Presidents.
The
reason
paid
members
become
important
is
they
provide
the
money
for
the
running
expenses,
they
donate
generously,
they
are
normally
very
interested
in
financially
supporting
Kannada
literature,
Arts,
etc
and
hence
they
should
have
a
voice.
Although
Kannada
Kuta
Presidents
represent
Kannada
Kutas,
how
are
we
sure
the
are
voicing
the
majority
opinion?
The
present
Constitution
is
an
attempt
to
balance
both
the
view
points.
Hope Dr. Nataraj is assured that AKKA is in tune with the direction suggested by him and his points have been already thought over, implemented or in the process of implementation. Thank you.
Sincerely,
- M. Jayaram, Chicago