• search
  • Live TV
ತ್ವರಿತ ಅಲರ್ಟ್ ಗಳಿಗಾಗಿ
ನೋಟಿಫಿಕೇಷನ್ ಅನುಮತಿಸಿ  
ತ್ವರಿತ ಅಲರ್ಟ್ ಗಳಿಗಾಗಿ
ನೋಟಿಫಿಕೇಷನ್ ಅನುಮತಿಸಿ  
For Daily Alerts

ಜಾಲತರಂಗ ಶೇಷಪ್ರಶ್ನೆ : ಕಾವೇರಿದ ಚರ್ಚೆ

By Staff
|
‘ಜಾಲ ತರಂಗ’ದ ಲೇಖನದ ಮೂಲಕ ಚಿಗುರಿದ ಚರ್ಚೆ ನಿಧಾನವಾಗಿ ಕವಲೊಡೆಯುತ್ತಿದೆ. ಡಾ.ಮೈ.ಶ್ರೀ.ನಟರಾಜ್‌ರ ಆರು ಹಿತವರು ನಿನಗೆ? ದೇವರೋ ದೇಶವೋ? ಲೇಖನದಲ್ಲಿನ ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯಗಳ ಕುರಿತು ನ್ಯೂಜೆರ್ಸಿಯ ಶೇಷಾದ್ರಿ ಅವರ ಆಕ್ಷೇಪ ಹಾಗೂ ನಟರಾಜ್‌ರ ಉತ್ತರಗಳನ್ನು ಓದಿ, ಓದುಗರು ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಕೆಲವು ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯೆಗಳು ಇಲ್ಲಿವೆ :

ಶೇಷಾದ್ರಿಯವರ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯೆ :

The Good Doctor’s Large Dose Of Misinformation !

ಅಂಕಣಕಾರ ನಟರಾಜ್‌ರ ಮಾರುತ್ತರ :

‘ಶೇಷಪ್ರಶ್ನೆ’ಗಳಿಗೆ ಇದೋ ನನ್ನ ಉತ್ತರ...


ಓದುಗರ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯೆಗಳು :

Dear Editor:

Instead of discussing the ideas, Mr. Sheshadri is trying to personally attack Dr. Nataraja. Mr. Sheshadri has strong views about the State of Alabama and the foreign policy of the USA. He is entitled to it. However, he should be able to hear other points of view also. If he disagrees, then let him give his version of the truth rather than making any personal attack.

Thanks,

- A.R. Char

*

Dear Editor,

I read with interest the readers feedback to Dr.Natarajs column and Natarajs rejoinder.

Here is what I observed:

* As Nataraj rightly says, a columnist generally projects his/her view or opinion about a News item. It fully is on his/her personal knowledge (depth or width) of the Newsarena. Might overlap with the general opinion of a whole lot of people, Or at times, only a handful of people might match the columnists opinion. Especially when the matter discussed is of political hue, and religion added to it, invariably it becomes very sensitive and the opinion/viewpoint may vary from different angles. Political commentators back in India, like M.V.Kamath, C.V.Rajagopal etc also have one time or other been accused of biased / misinforming commentaries.

* That way its no wonder Mr.Sheshadri opted to differ in his opinion to what Dr.Nataraj has put forth in the column. Well, Sheshadri, or any reader for that matter, has 100% freedom to do that. But the way he worded his feedback about the particular article in Natarajs column, is not diplomatic. He could have written with slightly more dignity and decorum. Very appreciable though is his excellent command over English language and the way thoughtprocess has been transformed into writing. Seldom we come across such "intelligent in writing too" readers. Sheshadri could have aired his views in a true objective manner doing away with the apparent character assassination of the columnist. May not be thats what he intended, but it sounds like that to me.

* You, as an Editor of an unbiased Newsportal did the right thing. You weighed both argument and the counterargument (or, lets say "viewpoint" instead of "argument") and decided to publish both unedited (I guess so). This is a model precedent to publish both writings (Sheshadris and Natarajs ) collated together and showcase them to the vast/intelligent crowd of thatskannada. That way, Sheshadris opinion is given its due respect and Dr. Natarajs rejoinder irons out any creases that might have formed in other readers.

My special wishes and regards to Sri Sheshadri for being a keen observer and to Dr.Nataraj for being candid in clarification and to you for taking true journalistic stand healthier for everyone.

Keep it up!

- Srivathsa Joshi, Maryland, USA

*

Dear Editor,

The Good Doctor Has Given A Large Dose Of Misinformation
I do not see any objectionable points in Dr Natarajs article.Only thing one need is awareness of current affairs.


I appriciate Mr Sheshadris willingness to defend USA/Bush Administration!!!!

Of course Dr Nataraj could have put more efforts to write much more elaborately so that person like Mr Sheshadri can understand!!!.
My request Mr Sheshadri, "Please have a control over your over language. Language speaks your mentality or attitute towards other person. I hope you will take my words sportively.


Thanks
God bless every one . We are here to create better India , better world


Cheers
- Muralidhar K ( Indian , Kannadiga)

*

ಮಾನ್ಯರೆ,

ಜಾಲತರಂಗದ ‘ಜಗಳ’ ಬಹಳ ದೂರದವರೆಗೂ ಮುಟ್ಟಿದೆ ಅನಿಸುತ್ತೆ. ನನಗೆ ಅನಿಸಿದ ಮಟ್ಟಿಗೆ ಶೇಷಾದ್ರಿಯವರ ಉತ್ತರ (ಅಥವ ವಿಮರ್ಶೆ) ಸಭ್ಯತೆಯ ಪರಿಧಿಯಲ್ಲೇ ಇದೆ. ಆದರೂ ನಟರಾಜ್‌ರವರು ಶೇಷಾದ್ರಿಯವರ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯೆಯನ್ನು ತುಂಬಾ ವೈಯಕ್ತಿಕವಾಗಿ ಪರಿಗಣಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ ಅನಿಸುತ್ತೆ.

www.kannadakasturi.com

http://www.baraha.com

ಬರಹವನ್ನು ಉಪಯೋಗಿಸುವುದು ಬಹಳ ಸುಲಭ. ಹೆಲ್ಪ್‌ ಮೆನು ನೋಡಿ ನೀವೇ ಕನ್ನಡದಲ್ಲಿ ಬಹಳ ಸುಲಭವಾಗಿ ಪತ್ರ ಬರೆಯಬಹುದು.

ಇತಿ ನಿಮ್ಮವ,

-ವಸಂತಕುಮಾರ್‌. ವಿ.

ಬೋಧನ ಹೊಸ ಹಳ್ಳಿ,

ಸಮೇತನ ಹಳ್ಳಿ(ಅಂಚೆ)

ಕಾಡುಗುಡಿ(ಮಾರ್ಗ)

ಬೆಂದಕಾಳೂರು-560067

ಮುಖಪುಟ / ಅಂಕಣಗಳು

ಕನ್ನಡ ಮ್ಯಾಟ್ರಿಮೋನಿಯಲ್ಲಿ - ಉಚಿತ ನೋಂದಣಿ !

Oneindia ಬ್ರೇಕಿಂಗ್ ನ್ಯೂಸ್,
ತಾಜಾ ಸುದ್ದಿ ತಕ್ಷಣವೇ ಪಡೆಯಿರಿ

Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Oneindia sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Oneindia website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more